Symmetrical vs. asymmetrical disk arrays
There are
symmetrical (for example RAID5) and asymmetrical (like RAID4) RAID arrays.
1
|
2
|
p
|
3
|
p
|
4
|
p
|
5
|
6
|
RAID 5
1
|
2
|
p
|
3
|
4
|
p
|
5
|
6
|
p
|
RAID 4
As load increases,
performance of an asymmetrical array is limited in some particular point. For
example, in RAID 4, during a write operation, a disk with parity will be saturated
first. In case of a symmetrical RAID 5 array all the member disks are
loaded in the same way; therefore there is no specific disk that limits the
performance.
From this two consequences follow:
1. In a symmetrical RAID 5 array
write performance can be increased by adding the disks. Write performance of
asymmetrical RAID 4 doesn't change as the number of drives increases because parity
data is still written to the single disk.
2. If you add one speedy rotational disk
or SSD to a RAID 5 array, you will not get noticeable speed-up. In case of RAID
4, the replacement of the parity disk with an SSD increases performance
significantly because "bottleneck" related to parity update is
removed.
All this applies
in a similar manner to symmetrical RAID 6 and RAID 1E, and asymmetrical RAID3 and
RAID-DP.
Comments
Post a Comment